WASHINGTON, Feb 5 (Reuters) - President Trump's recent statement expressing interest in developing the Gaza Strip may have seemed sudden, but it aligns with his administration's ambitious expansionist agenda.
Since his return to the White House just over two weeks ago, Trump's America First" policy has evolved into "America More, with a focus on acquiring new territories despite his earlier promises to avoid foreign conflicts.
During a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump floated the idea of the U.S. owning Gaza and creating a resort for international communities. This proposal, along with his suggestions regarding the Panama Canal, Greenland, and Canada, highlights his transactional approach to relationships and global affairs.
While some see potential in his ideas, others view them with skepticism. Trump's consideration of resettling Palestinians from Gaza faces criticism, with concerns raised about human rights violations and ethnic cleansing.
Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has previously referred to Gaza as valuable property, emphasizing financial potential over humanitarian concerns. Although Netanyahu praised Trump's innovative thinking, the legality and practicality of these proposals remain unclear.
Some experts speculate that Trump's statements may serve as negotiation tactics rather than serious policy intentions. The potential impact on the longstanding vision of a two-state solution in the region is a matter of debate.
Despite the protests and concerns raised by various groups, Trump's unorthodox foreign policy approach continues to be a subject of scrutiny and controversy among both domestic and international audiences.